Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site rabbit.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!mhuxl!ulysses!allegra!alice!rabbit!ark
From: ark@rabbit.UUCP (Andrew Koenig)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Digitally encoded square waves
Message-ID: <2894@rabbit.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Jun-84 22:25:57 EDT
Article-I.D.: rabbit.2894
Posted: Fri Jun 22 22:25:57 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 27-Jun-84 08:50:03 EDT
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 9

If you've read this far, you've probably seen a picture of the
output of a CD player when trying to reproduce a square wave.
Doesn't look much like a square wave, does it?

Well, if you take that waveform and sample it at the appropriate
rate, you will get a series of samples that are INDISTINGUISHABLE
from samples of a square wave.  What reason is there to choose one
over the other on playback?