Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Denver Mods 4/2/84) 6/24/83; site drutx.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!drutx!pmr
From: pmr@drutx.UUCP (Rastocny)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Tubes/bipolar/FETs
Message-ID: <547@drutx.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 30-Jun-84 11:48:46 EDT
Article-I.D.: drutx.547
Posted: Sat Jun 30 11:48:46 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 1-Jul-84 07:18:34 EDT
References: <494@drutx.UUCP> <2887@rabbit.UUCP> <515@drutx.UUCP> <566@opus.UUCP>, <1203@ihuxl.UUCP> <2762@watcgl.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver
Lines: 15

My reference to teh CJ/Hafler comparison was the "equivalent priced
Hafler," that being the DH-110.  The Hafler sounds OK out of the box,
much better than a lot of products in the same price range, but not as
good as others.

While we're on the subject, can anyone hear differences between
bipolar preamps (let's just confine our discussion to this simple
voltage amplifier first) and FETs?  Theory says we shouldn't.  What
does reality say?  Has anyone recently "upgraded" their preamp and
noticed these differences I reference?

		Yours for higher fidelity,
		Phil Rastocny
		AT&T-ISL
		..!drutx!pmr