Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site houxa.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!houxm!houxa!czp From: czp@houxa.UUCP (C.PODARAS) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: CD and sample rate Message-ID: <473@houxa.UUCP> Date: Mon, 2-Jul-84 10:13:00 EDT Article-I.D.: houxa.473 Posted: Mon Jul 2 10:13:00 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 3-Jul-84 02:47:45 EDT References: <66@sunybcs.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ Lines: 37 came in for a few last things at work, and decided to flip thru the net. gawd, what a mistake -- got pearson at his finest (?) again. oh well, a little humor for the road. charles, let me modify my previous flame. you are SUCH a douchebag. let's see... today i've read five of your postings, and ALL of them have contained "factual inaccuracies" (a nice term for bs). at least you're consistent... regarding your assertion of a sony cd player working in multiplexed mono that halves the sampling rate: the cdp101 utilizes a single d/a (unfortunately not a pearson labs 32-bit 10mhz chip -:) ), which converts one, then the other channel during a *single* sampling period. it does not halve the sampling rate. the player's problem, however, is that it doesn't delay one reconstructed output by the appropriate half-sampling- period delay, causing a relative delay of 11.34 us between channels. and as tests from pearson labs have shown, we all know that this just totally destroys any chance of appreciating such classics as beethoven's "square wave #9 in e minor", or little feat's "square waves don't fail me now" seriously, charles...thanks again for all the entertaining moments. have you considered branching out into videos? ciao, chuck podaras bellcore no more!