Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site vice.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!houxz!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekchips!vice!shauns
From: shauns@vice.UUCP (Shaun Simpkins)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: FET preamps vs. Bipolar vs. Relays vs.
Message-ID: <1363@vice.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 3-Jul-84 12:37:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: vice.1363
Posted: Tue Jul  3 12:37:18 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 5-Jul-84 00:19:28 EDT
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 35

Something really bugs me about statements like, to paraphrase Phil R.,
"FET amps shouldn't sound different than Bipolar amps.  What does reality
tell us?".

How would one go about this normally?  Well, I'd just get a FET amp from one
manufacturer, a Bipolar amp from another, equalize levels, listen, and judge,
right?  Uh, no.  What we're trying to do here is discern the differences
between active elements.  By taking two different amps from two different
manufacturers, I guarantee you that we've also taken two different amplifier
topologies, beyond that needed to take into account biasing differences.
I bet you what we hear first is gross differences in system configuration, not
active elements.

What I would consider a more valid test of active elements is:
  1) decide on a common amplifier configuration, say basic Op-Amp - 
     high-gain stage followed by level shift followed by low impedance output
     driver;
  2) determine biasing requirements for each active element;
  3) mix, match, and listen appropriately.

By blindly listening to different amps from different manufacturers, all we
can really say is, if a particular amplifier sounds better to us, it is
because that amp's designer did a better job of minimizing the transfer
elements' imperfections.  We can't say that active element X is better than
active element Y - we haven't isolated all the variables.

Comments?

The wandering squash,
-- 
				Shaun Simpkins

uucp:	{ucbvax,decvax,chico,pur-ee,cbosg,ihnss}!teklabs!tekcad!vice!shauns
CSnet:	shauns@tek
ARPAnet:shauns.tek@rand-relay