Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!ihuxl!seifert
From: seifert@ihuxl.UUCP (D.A. Seifert)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Hafler Complacency: my opinions
Message-ID: <1220@ihuxl.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 7-Jul-84 14:46:54 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihuxl.1220
Posted: Sat Jul  7 14:46:54 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 8-Jul-84 00:29:11 EDT
References: <1136@ihuxr.UUCP> <571@drutx.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 25

I haven't made a career out of auditioning audio gear, so I'm
not intimately familar with many of the brands Mr. Golden Ear
has ranked for us.  I would point out that some of these brands
have a wide spectrum of products.  Sony, for example, makes
some low-end stuff that might be appropriate for.. what was that
noise-maker he mentioned? Michelle Jacksoff? On the other hand,
they make some nice high end gear that pushes back the state of the
art. For example, they were into power-FETs *years* ago.  Have you
listened to the TA5650, Mr. Golden Ear? Or any of it's siblings?
Very nice sounding amps. (or rather UN-sounding)

I suppose I should get busy and replace all the solder in my
components with official silver solder, (regular solder is
a leading cause of 'tinny' sound, you know) but solder fumes
often give one a taste for non-esoteric music, thus defeating
the whole purpose.

Hey Woodstock, listen up, can you hear the fingerprint on the window
in the recording studio? tsk! tsk!
-- 
	_____
       /_____\		{the cute closing-line generator has
      /_______\			the day off, sorry.}
	|___|			    Snoopy
    ____|___|_____	       ihnp4!ihuxl!seifert