Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site whuxl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!whuxl!wjm
From: wjm@whuxl.UUCP (MITCHELL)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Re: Hafler Components
Message-ID: <38@whuxl.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 12-Jul-84 12:07:10 EDT
Article-I.D.: whuxl.38
Posted: Thu Jul 12 12:07:10 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 13-Jul-84 04:24:06 EDT
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Inc.
Lines: 12

<gulp, gulp, GULP>
I agree with Dick Dunn's assessment of Hafler components.
While they may not give quite the performance of Mark Levinson or other lines
that cost 10 times as much, they are considerably better that the mass market
gear from Sansui, Sony, Pioneer, Kenwood, Nikko, NAD, et al.
Also, its hard to match Hafler for value per dollar (especially when you build
their kits).
Admittedly, I'm somewhat biased since my system is built around a Hafler 110
preamp and 220 power amp, but I have heard few components that would give any
improvement (unless I want to spend $5,000 for a Levinson).
Regards,
Bill Mitchell (whuxl!wjm)