Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site whuxl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!houxm!whuxl!wjm
From: wjm@whuxl.UUCP (MITCHELL)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: cables
Message-ID: <50@whuxl.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 17-Jul-84 16:43:16 EDT
Article-I.D.: whuxl.50
Posted: Tue Jul 17 16:43:16 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 18-Jul-84 03:21:38 EDT
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Inc.
Lines: 12

<gulp>
One compromise between high end and trash are the Discwasher Gold-ens, which
are better than the low end cables and run about $10 for a pair of 1 meter
cables.
However, given what people spend on audio equipment (and even more so if
video is involved), cutting corners on low end cables seems to be false
economy.
Personally, I'm using the Monster Cable Interlink II's (not cheap - about
$45 for a 1 meter cable pair, but cost effective when one considers the
cost of a typical stereo system owned by a reader of this newsgroup.
Remember, a chain is only as strong as its weakest link.
Bill Mitchell (whuxl!wjm)