Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site tektronix.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!houxz!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!lfarr
From: lfarr@tektronix.UUCP (Larry Farr)
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: anti-lock brakes (again)
Message-ID: <2973@tektronix.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 6-Jul-84 11:43:09 EDT
Article-I.D.: tektronix.2973
Posted: Fri Jul  6 11:43:09 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Jul-84 07:28:41 EDT
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 11


Another [law suit based] reason to squelch anti-lock brakes: no pretty
black marks on the street for the investigators to measure. Collision
mechanics would take a new twist ... computer simulation ... but who
would like to have a computer testify against them.

By the way, didn't Ford have some sort of anti-lock brake system
available on the Continental some years back [or even now]?

L. Farr      {ihnp4|decvax}!tektronix!lfarr