Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site rochester.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!emil From: emil@rochester.UUCP (Emil Rainero) Newsgroups: net.columbia Subject: Failed Launch Message-ID: <7561@rochester.UUCP> Date: Tue, 26-Jun-84 11:33:43 EDT Article-I.D.: rocheste.7561 Posted: Tue Jun 26 11:33:43 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 30-Jun-84 01:01:56 EDT Sender: emil@rochester.UUCP Organization: U. of Rochester, CS Dept. Lines: 14 From: Emil Rainero What an amazing thing to hapen. NASA must be wondering if they did the right thing replacing the original #1 engine. The original #1 engine was replaced by an engine from Challenger (flown twice before) due to heat shield delamination. The shield is .0040-in. thich and had delaminated .0020-in. The other two engines were both veterans of space, #2 having lifted Spacelab 1 on Columbia and #1 on three flights in Challenger. Still the engines are are marvel compared to the beasts used on the Saturn 5. Emil Rainero emil@Rochester