Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-akov68!boyajian
From: boyajian@akov68.DEC (Jerry Boyajian)
Newsgroups: net.comics
Subject: re: Mary Jane Watson
Message-ID: <2591@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 16-Jul-84 08:20:46 EDT
Article-I.D.: decwrl.2591
Posted: Mon Jul 16 08:20:46 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 17-Jul-84 06:28:22 EDT
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 18

After all the foofarah about the way Mary Jane Watson dressed in AMAZING SPIDER-
MAN #256, I thought I'd take a glance at the book when I was next in my comic
shop. Oddly enough, I find that I have to agree with Mr. Martillo... sort of.

If nothing had been said, and I had read that issue, I never would have thought
anything of MJ's apparel. I certainly wouldn't have thought that she dressed
like a slut. However, since Martillo mentioned it, I'd have to agree that her
apparel (for those of you who haven't looked at that issue, she was wearing a
mini-skirt, fishnet stockings, and high heels) and stance are very much like a
hooker's. Perhaps I should say, like a stereotypical hooker's. The times that I
have seen real hookers, in Boston's Combat Zone and NY's Times Square, there
was as great a variety in their appearance as in any group of people. That's why
I only sort of agree with Mr. Martillo.

--- jayembee (Jerry Boyajian, DEC, Maynard, MA)

UUCP:	{decvax|ihnp4|allegra|ucbvax|...}!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-akov68!boyajian
ARPA:	boyajian%akov68.DEC@DECWRL.ARPA