Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site whuxl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!whuxl!wjm From: wjm@whuxl.UUCP (MITCHELL) Newsgroups: net.consumers Subject: Re: bothersome phone calls Message-ID: <36@whuxl.UUCP> Date: Tue, 10-Jul-84 10:08:31 EDT Article-I.D.: whuxl.36 Posted: Tue Jul 10 10:08:31 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 11-Jul-84 01:04:39 EDT Organization: Bell Communications Research, Inc. Lines: 14 I've also heard that New York was considering a similar option for tagging names in phone books BTW New York Telephone does offer its customers several ways to deter those #$%^^&%$#% telephone soliciters: You can have your address left out of the directory listing, e.g. Smith, John ................976-3838 You can have your name and phone number left out of the "reverse" directories that list names and numbers by address. You can get an unlisted (non-published) number. While the first two are free, there is a charge for the unlisted number. However, these are only deterrents and will not stop the #$%^%&'s that merely dial every phone number in sequence .... 976-3838, 3839, 3840, etc. Bill Mitchell (whuxl!wjm)