Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site west44.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!houxm!houxz!vax135!ukc!west44!gurr
From: gurr@west44.UUCP (Dave Gurr)
Newsgroups: net.crypt
Subject: Re: Fermat's Last Theorem
Message-ID: <270@west44.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 24-Jul-84 06:31:35 EDT
Article-I.D.: west44.270
Posted: Tue Jul 24 06:31:35 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 19-Jul-84 03:56:37 EDT
References: <1004@druxt.UUCP> <2649@ncsu.UUCP>
Organization: CS Dept., Westfield College, London
Lines: 18

< force of habit ... >

Surely one of the main reasons why Arnold Arnold's proof could not be
correct is, due to the relevance of it to military codes etc., he would
either have been paid to keep his mouth shut (very rich) or be made to
keep it shit permanently (very dead).

I'm sure that there are many organisations who , if they thought that this
guy could crack their codes, would react in this sort of way.

	                    		 mcvax
	"You can't clean the      	      \
	toilet Neil, real students		ukc!west44!gurr
	don't do that!"			      /
					vax135

	Dave Gurr, Westfield College, Univ. of London, England.