Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) Newsgroups: net.followup,net.politics Subject: Re: Re: Lockport Blast: safety of oil vs nuclear power Message-ID: <4146@utzoo.UUCP> Date: Fri, 27-Jul-84 17:19:11 EDT Article-I.D.: utzoo.4146 Posted: Fri Jul 27 17:19:11 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 27-Jul-84 17:19:11 EDT References: <338@tellab1.UUCP> <1588@druxv.UUCP>, <651@teltone.UUCP> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology Lines: 41 > Nuclear power is (usually) just slower about its destructive work > than the fossil fuels. Nuclear waste will leach into the environment > for the next quarter million years. Most nuclear waste, with the plutonium removed (if for no other reason than it being too valuable to throw away) is no more radioactive than natural uranium ore within a few centuries. There are impossibly huge amounts of natural uranium ore in the Earth's crust already; if stuff at that level of activity is dangerous, we've had it. Also, please note that the wastes associated with some other means of power generation, such as coal, are dangerous chemical poisons -- they have no halflife and will be around *forever*. > As for "The Health Hazards of Not Going Nuclear", I haven't read it. You should. It's very interesting, particularly when Petr Beckmann (the author) starts comparing the statements of the anti-nuclear folks with the facts. There is no doubt that many of the anti-nuclear people are sincere, but some of them aren't, and there are some outrageous lies masquerading as facts. > But I'll bet nuclear is put against large coal and oil plants instead > of the real winners, decentralized solar, biogas, and natural gas. Nuclear is put against everything in Beckmann's comparisons. All forms of power, bar none, have health hazards. (Including decentralized solar. After car accidents, the biggest cause of accidental death in North America is accidental falls. Solar systems will often be on rooftops.) Industrial accidents occur in all forms of industry, hence in all forms of power generation. Nuclear generally wins simply because it is so concentrated -- there is less volume of hazardous material, hence less handling and less opportunity for accident and injury. > Read "Soft Energy Paths" and other works by Amory Lovins for further > info. But check his claims before taking them as facts. Some are not. -- "We almost lost Lockport!" Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology {allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!henry