Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site akgua.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!mcnc!akgua!glc From: glc@akgua.UUCP (G.L. Cleveland [Lindsay]) Newsgroups: net.ham-radio Subject: Re: Morse code stinks Message-ID: <858@akgua.UUCP> Date: Sun, 1-Jul-84 13:41:37 EDT Article-I.D.: akgua.858 Posted: Sun Jul 1 13:41:37 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 3-Jul-84 00:29:21 EDT References: <2812@ecsvax.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Technologies/Bell Labs, Atlanta Lines: 32 I thought this topic was well chewed over during the days when the FCC was considering a no-code license. Anyway, I'll drop in some observations. Just because a hand-held doesn't have a Key jack doesn't mean that the Morse Code isn't used on VHF. I have an HF transmitter that doesn't have a SSB mode. By using that sort of logic, should one assume that SSB is not used on 40 meters? The point is: Morse Code *is* used on VHF! Just because you only have an FM rig and don't listen to the DX'ers and satellite buffs doesn't mean that a particular mode is not in use. Do some reading in some of those sections of Worldradio or QST that you usually skip over. You'll find lots of instances where knowledge of the Code saved life or property. Without our large pool of world-wide "Code Readers", many of those instances would not have turned out so well. And a final note...not all the world is affluent! Remember the project the ARRL advocated some years back of encouraging clubs and individuals to sponsor a $50.00 rcvr/xmtr kit to be sent to various third-world locales? If the U.S. went no-code we would be effectively saying to the less-affluent hams of the world "We don't want to talk to you unless you can do SSB or ASCII!" Ham Radio has many facets. Your license allows you to enjoy any and all. Getting it means you are *qualified* to use any mode. Just because you aren't interested in a particular mode today doesn't mean you won't be next month. From the laid-back (lassiez-faire) ham shack of W4IZI. Lindsay