Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site uok.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uok!mpackard
From: mpackard@uok.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.ham-radio
Subject: mpackard rides again - (nf)
Message-ID: <2800005@uok.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 3-Jul-84 17:04:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uok.2800005
Posted: Tue Jul  3 17:04:00 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 6-Jul-84 00:14:31 EDT
Lines: 15
Nf-ID: #N:uok:2800005:000:601
Nf-From: uok!mpackard    Jul  3 16:04:00 1984

#N:uok:2800005:000:601
uok!mpackard    Jul  3 16:04:00 1984

:-)

I didn't attack anyone personally and I hope no one felt that way.
I only asked a question (sarcasticaly, sorry) and voiced an opinion.
Several people responded with good arguments for getting rid of
code in the upper freq's but I haven't seen any good arguments for
keeping the requirement, maybe there isn't one.  The idea of my
learning code isn't the subject, as I've already learned it and then
stopped using it.  I don't recall the writers name but (s)he used the
comparison of learning the bit patterns of ASCII or BAUDOT in order to
operate on ham radio.  This was well put.
uok!mpackard