Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 3/23/84; site cbosgd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!cbosgd!mark
From: mark@cbosgd.UUCP (Mark Horton)
Newsgroups: net.mail.headers
Subject: Re: internetwork addressing questions
Message-ID: <160@cbosgd.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 26-Jul-84 23:16:14 EDT
Article-I.D.: cbosgd.160
Posted: Thu Jul 26 23:16:14 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Jul-84 09:08:13 EDT
References: <694@hou3c.UUCP>, <1102@psuvax1.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus
Lines: 11

There must be lots of machines that talk to both ucbvax and
psuvax1 - cbosgd for example.

But I confess I can't understand why djb@burdvax.UUCP.BITNET
would be a useful address.  If your system understands BITNET
but not UUCP, then djb%burdvax.UUCP@psuvax1.BITNET or the
more intended @psuvax1.BITNET:djb@burdvax.UUCP ought to work.
From the ARPANET I think Berkeley will gateway to BITNET,
from CSNET there's probably a gateway somewhere too.
From UUCP it depends on what software you have and where you
want to send the mail.