Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site bbncca.ARPA Path: utzoo!linus!bbncca!sdyer From: sdyer@bbncca.ARPA (Steve Dyer) Newsgroups: net.motss Subject: Re: My last remarks Message-ID: <815@bbncca.ARPA> Date: Fri, 29-Jun-84 17:58:53 EDT Article-I.D.: bbncca.815 Posted: Fri Jun 29 17:58:53 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 30-Jun-84 07:31:44 EDT References: <3137@cbscc.UUCP> Organization: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, Ma. Lines: 32 >Well, now I'm really going to go away. Again, I am sorry for >any hurt I might have caused. I intend none. I do oppose >homosexuality and the embracing of it by our society as being >right or normal, however. I cannot, in good conscience do >otherwise. I submit that leaving in the middle of a discussion which you initiated, without having addressed ANY of the points which others have disputed is, at best, irresponsible, at worst, cowardice. Even though I have been careful to mail you copies of all my responses as well as posting them to net.motss, I have seen nothing from you which acknowledges them, let alone addresses their content. I try to leave open the possibility of there being a UUCP black hole, but that seems rather unlikely. Naturally, if you have recently responded, please disregard this notice... You have offered no defense whatsoever to justify your feelings that "homosexual relationships are inherently unstable", you have given no reason that homosexual acts should be singled out for condemnation as "immoral", and one shudders to realize that you will be joyfully passing this "reasoning", if we could call it that, on to your kids. I submit to you, and to the audience, that we see here the dark side of what is called "faith"--there has been no reason offered or present in Mr. Dubuc's articles. Is this a bit harsh? I think not, for all Dubuc needs to do is to confront the issues to remove the stigma of irrationality. I still invite him to do so. -- /Steve Dyer {decvax,linus,ima}!bbncca!sdyer sdyer@bbncca.ARPA