Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site bbncca.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!bbncca!sdyer
From: sdyer@bbncca.ARPA (Steve Dyer)
Newsgroups: net.motss
Subject: Re: We aren't that simple.
Message-ID: <833@bbncca.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 10-Jul-84 09:23:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: bbncca.833
Posted: Tue Jul 10 09:23:15 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 11-Jul-84 00:56:13 EDT
References: <2409@decwrl.UUCP>
Organization: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, Ma.
Lines: 16


	     Deep rooted, I say.  For example, and more relevant to
	net.motss--I haven't ever seen a gay or lesbian relationship that
	did not *most of the time* exhibit differential 'sex roles.' They
	may swap or submerge, but from what I've seen, they surface
	daily.  They're so solidly a part of us that they persist when
	they're not relevant.  Comments? 

Provocative, but I'm a little unclear on what you are trying to say:
Gay and lesbian people are also ruled to some extent by sex roles (not
surprising) OR that gay relationships display a male/female role polarity
(definitely disputable.)  Can you expand on this?  
-- 
/Steve Dyer
{decvax,linus,ima}!bbncca!sdyer
sdyer@bbncca.ARPA