Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site uok.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uok!dwhitney
From: dwhitney@uok.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: Re: Star Trek III review (non-spoile - (nf)
Message-ID: <5100032@uok.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 3-Jul-84 13:34:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uok.5100032
Posted: Tue Jul  3 13:34:00 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 6-Jul-84 00:16:45 EDT
References: <158@pertec.UUCP>
Lines: 15
Nf-ID: #R:pertec:-15800:uok:5100032:000:508
Nf-From: uok!dwhitney    Jul  3 12:34:00 1984

#R:pertec:-15800:uok:5100032:000:508
uok!dwhitney    Jul  3 12:34:00 1984


Hold the phone!!  Who says ST1 was a film "no Trekkie could love"?
I loved it!! and I've been a full-fledeged card-carrying Trekkie for the
last 12 years! I'll admit it wasnt as good as the last two films, but, hey,
I DID think it was a good film in its own right..(better than NO return at
ALL, right?  It sure made the studio more careful about how the following
stories were written, didn't it??)

An affirmed TREK 1 fan, (and TREK 2 and Trek 3 and TRek nnn)
!ctvax!uokvax!uok!dwhitney
David Whitney
/ex