Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ccieng5.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!houxz!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccieng5!rdz
From: rdz@ccieng5.UUCP ( Robert D. Zarcone)
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: "The Candidate"
Message-ID: <501@ccieng5.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 20-Jul-84 17:00:24 EDT
Article-I.D.: ccieng5.501
Posted: Fri Jul 20 17:00:24 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 23-Jul-84 01:29:51 EDT
Organization: CCI Central Engineering, Rochester, NY
Lines: 19

I posted a question about this movie several days ago.
I did this because I believed this news group was to
promote the discussion of movies.  It appears that
the real reason for this group is for "me too!" articles.
I don't mind someone sharing their feelings on a picture
they have seen.  I also appreciate being warned not to
waste my money on something that is heavily promoted but
not worth seeing.  But I can't understand why dozens of
people find it necessary to say "yeah, I saw him too!"
about any person or thing that is currently in a movie.

I am reasonably sure that anyone that has access to the net
has a relatively elevated level of intelligence.  The "me
too!" articles seem to say that those with access don't
care to exercise that intelligence.  I am sure that many
flames will be directed at me, if this article is read.
Please save the space for "Dan Akroyd and the Temple of
Doom" articles.  I don't plan on comming back for awhile.