Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site flairvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!flairvax!kissell From: kissell@flairvax.UUCP (Kevin Kissell) Newsgroups: net.philosophy Subject: Re: Re: Drifting Sideways Message-ID: <653@flairvax.UUCP> Date: Sat, 14-Jul-84 15:02:17 EDT Article-I.D.: flairvax.653 Posted: Sat Jul 14 15:02:17 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 15-Jul-84 10:11:48 EDT Organization: Fairchild AI Lab, Palo Alto, CA Lines: 43 (Responding to judy@ism780) > I think the assumptions you make in the base note are 1) no new > products and a static economy and 2) machines available to perform all > menial tasks. Since neither of these are true I don't think there is as > much need for concern as you think. I tried not to make any assumptions of stasis in the economy, and I was not talking about a present-day crisis. I was trying to point out that the liberating goals and potential of automation are in conflict with the attitudes that govern our present society ("Ya don't work, ya don't eat.") As a friend of mine pointed out, we will probably blow our civilization off the planet before it becomes a real problem. If I may be permitted to be optimistic, I still think we need to look hard at what we want to do to resolve the conflict. > Robots are better suited than people to welding. Let's face it, welding > is unpleasant. But they are not better suited for being masseuses, > therapists, child care workers, etc.. The service > industry will provide jobs to those workers displaced by technology. > How much those services are worth will be measured by a free market. Many people view the growth of the service sector to be unbounded and a solution to industrial and agricultural sector unemployment. This does not hold up under closer scrutiny. As one economist put it, you cannot have a nation of people selling hamburgers to one another. The service system requires net input. The input must come from some form of real production. With regard to job sharing, as some have proposed it (and as is being practiced in some industries in the Netherlands): when the cost of machine labor becomes so low that the value of a day's labor cannot feed one person, how can it feed two? Kevin D. Kissell Fairchild Research Center Advanced Processor Development uucp: {ihnp4 decvax}!decwrl!\ >flairvax!kissell {ucbvax sdcrdcf}!hplabs!/ "Any closing epigram, regardless of truth or wit, grows galling after a number of repetitions"