Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site randvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!houxz!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!randvax!edhall
From: edhall@randvax.UUCP (Ed Hall)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Mondale Chooses Running Mate
Message-ID: <1847@randvax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 18-Jul-84 06:14:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: randvax.1847
Posted: Wed Jul 18 06:14:49 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 20-Jul-84 03:21:39 EDT
References: <138@analog.UUCP>
Organization: Rand Corp., Santa Monica
Lines: 19

> It really is interesting to me that this move is apparently NOT viewed with
> suspicion, while Reagan's (admittedly feeble) attempts to curry favor with
> environmentalists is viewed with great suspicion--make that *GREAT*
> suspicion.  I feel that both of these moves are motivated by the same
> desire--to become the next four-year resident of the White House.  If one
> attempt is suspicious, so is the other.
>
> Comments, anyone?
>
> Kim Helliwell
> hplabs!analog!kim

Considering the fact that he re-appointed Ann Burford the day before his
meeting with key environmentalists, the suspicion that Mr. Reagan is being
hypocritical is likely to be well-founded.  The worst you can say about
Mondale's selection of running mate is that it was a pragmatic decision.

		-Ed Hall
		decvax!randvax!edhall