Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site teltone.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!houxz!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!teltone!mark
From: mark@teltone.UUCP (Mark McWiggins)
Newsgroups: net.followup,net.politics
Subject: Re: Re: Lockport Blast: safety of oil vs nuclear power
Message-ID: <651@teltone.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 1-Aug-84 00:10:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: teltone.651
Posted: Wed Aug  1 00:10:48 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 27-Jul-84 08:39:20 EDT
References: <338@tellab1.UUCP> <1588@druxv.UUCP>
Organization: Teltone Corp., Kirkland, WA
Lines: 15

<Mutants for Nuclear Power "-;>

Nuclear power is (usually) just slower about its destructive work
than the fossil fuels.  Nuclear waste will leach into the environment
for the next quarter million years.

As for "The Health Hazards of Not Going Nuclear", I haven't read it.
But I'll bet nuclear is put against large coal and oil plants instead
of the real winners, decentralized solar, biogas, and natural gas.

Read "Soft Energy Paths" and other works by Amory Lovins for further
info.
-- 

....tektronix!uw-beaver!teltone!mark