Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site teldata.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!wjh12!genrad!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!teltone!teldata!tac From: tac@teldata.UUCP Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: 1986 SUPREME COURT RULING - (nf) Message-ID: <453@teldata.UUCP> Date: Tue, 24-Jul-84 17:55:13 EDT Article-I.D.: teldata.453 Posted: Tue Jul 24 17:55:13 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 28-Jul-84 01:10:42 EDT References: <162@sb6.UUCP> <10100057@ea.UUCP> Organization: Teltone Corp., Kirkland, WA Lines: 43 , (sop to the blank line eaters--consider it a religious sacrifice) >> I'll try asking again (for the last time?): >> >> How do you justify passing laws that force non-prejudiced >> behavior on people who own/run companies, when you don't >> pass similar laws for people who don't own/run companies? >> >> Note: I am *not* advocating prejudiced behavior - I don't like nonsensical >> behavior. I'm trying to get the above question answered. The only *attempt* >> to answer the question has been Ed Halls (paraphrased) "The good of the >> community outways the freedom of people who own companies, but not the >> freedom of individuals." What you quoted from is my reply to that, pointing >> out that this may not be so. >> >>