Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site hou5d.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!houxm!houxz!vax135!ariel!hou5f!hou5g!hou5h!hou5a!hou5d!mat
From: mat@hou5d.UUCP (M Terribile)
Newsgroups: net.rec.photo
Subject: Re: Kodachrome vs. Ektachrome
Message-ID: <1003@hou5d.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Jun-84 23:58:17 EDT
Article-I.D.: hou5d.1003
Posted: Fri Jun 22 23:58:17 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 27-Jun-84 08:42:04 EDT
References: <2624@ncsu.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Holmdel, NJ
Lines: 11

Regarding the ``next day processing available in many cities'' for Ektachrome
(must be a TM of Kodak), when I worked in NYC, I used a small lab that did
*four-hour Ektachrome*.  Price?  10% below Kodak list for the same work.  In
other words, not cheap, but not custom priced either.

If anyone cares to know where the place is, send mail and I'll reply.
-- 

	from Mole End			Mark Terribile
		(scrape .. dig )	hou5d!mat
    ,..      .,,       ,,,   ..,***_*.  (soon hou4b!mat)