Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxn.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxn!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxn.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Rich Rosen & Logic.
Message-ID: <800@pyuxn.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 28-Jun-84 18:32:03 EDT
Article-I.D.: pyuxn.800
Posted: Thu Jun 28 18:32:03 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 30-Jun-84 04:14:38 EDT
References: <156@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway N.J.
Lines: 16

> RR:    To show that the internal logic of the faith is coherent is not
>        enough.
> Godel: If one can show (prove) that any interesting (sufficiently powerful)
>        belief system is coherent (consistent), within that system this
>        would itself prove that system inconsistant.
> SAK:   I take it from the tenor of RR's comment, that he can prove that
>        his own belief system is consistent.  This must mean it's either
>        inconsistent or uninteresting.  Vote? ;-)

Who said that reality had to be interesting? :-)

On the other hand, who said reality had to be consistent...

[I expected better from you...  Remember, it's all a joke.]
-- 
If it doesn't change your life, it's not worth doing.     Rich Rosen  pyuxn!rlr