Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxi.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!ihuxi!cher
From: cher@ihuxi.UUCP (Mike Musing)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Absurdity Continued
Message-ID: <973@ihuxi.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 13-Jul-84 14:14:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihuxi.973
Posted: Fri Jul 13 14:14:33 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Jul-84 01:40:11 EDT
References: <884@akgua.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 23

> 
> What do you mean that "Secularists...do not make their living
> representing atheism" ??  Isn't that in the eye of the beholder ??
> 
> For instance I would classify the following groups and individuals
> as Secularists who indeed making their living promoting atheism
> if you will permit me to be very literal with the word ATHEIST,
> which means "without God" or A Theos in the Greek:

I did not say that nobody makes their living representing atheism!!!
I did say that the people who amused David so much were not representing
atheism for the living.

Ernest Angeley probably does not look particularly funny when he talks
about politics. It is his preaching and healing that look so pathetic
to some beholders (and so majestic to others). These are the moments
when he acts as God's representative.

As Jesse Jackson would say:
   My words were taken out of context
                           Mike Musing

P.S. Does anyone know if Angeley is wearing a wig?