Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxn.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxn!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxn.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.religion.jewish
Subject: Re: Martillo's ORIGINAL statement  (from net.women et al)
Message-ID: <858@pyuxn.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 13-Jul-84 22:06:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: pyuxn.858
Posted: Fri Jul 13 22:06:43 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 15-Jul-84 01:15:13 EDT
References: <8299@watmath.UUCP> <2591@allegra.UUCP> <636@ihuxt.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway N.J.
Lines: 17

I just had to reprint this here for the readers of this newsgroup:

> I have seen several claims in articles in newspapers and in journals over
> the last couple months that men will make direct statements (like
> "men are insensitive and callous") while women are much more indirect
> (like "I think men are insensitive and callous" or "it seems to me that
> men are insensitive and callous").  
> 
> Indirectness with potential for deniability is no excuse for bigoted
> statements.
> 
> Yehoyaqim Shemtob Martillo

(!!!)
-- 
a more wretched hive of scum and villainy: not found
					Rich Rosen    pyuxn!rlr