Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site ea.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ea!mwm
From: mwm@ea.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers
Subject: Re: Movie review: GHOSTBUSTERS - (nf)
Message-ID: <11700012@ea.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Jun-84 20:45:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ea.11700012
Posted: Fri Jun 22 20:45:00 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 27-Jun-84 09:18:15 EDT
References: <973@sri-arpa.UUCP>
Lines: 17
Nf-ID: #R:sri-arpa:-97300:ea:11700012:000:390
Nf-From: ea!mwm    Jun 22 19:45:00 1984

#R:sri-arpa:-97300:ea:11700012:000:390
ea!mwm    Jun 22 19:45:00 1984

/***** ea:net.sf-lovers / cbosgd!bsw /  8:55 pm  Jun 19, 1984 */
	Ok, now that that is taken care of,  I got the impression
	that the Ghostbusters [spoiler deleted] didn't enjoy
	having ghosts boxed up in a toaster.  Or is it just me??


		Ben Walls
		...cbosgd!bsw
/* ---------- */

Definitely you. Sigurney Weaver's problems started before the Ghostbusters
ever had a paying job.

	<mike