Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site whuxle.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!whuxle!eric
From: eric@whuxle.UUCP (Eric Holtman)
Newsgroups: net.movies,net.sf-lovers
Subject: --SPIELBERG'S-- GREMLINS
Message-ID: <481@whuxle.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 26-Jun-84 18:25:22 EDT
Article-I.D.: whuxle.481
Posted: Tue Jun 26 18:25:22 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 28-Jun-84 03:32:20 EDT
Distribution: net
Organization: Bell Labs, Whippany
Lines: 22

GREMLINS *--IS--* SPIELBERG'S......

Sure, he may have had "next to nothing to do with it". RIGHT. He
just put up the money, that's all. Nothing big. He just hung a couple
a million out on the line.....

Just because Dante directed the movie doesn't mean Spielberg just
sent a check and said "send me a film box, with footage". 

Besides, my two local rags both say "--Spielberg's GREMLINS"

So, all you Dante fans.... although he may have done some real
work on this film, by no means did Stevie just sit on his ass, and
so I still consider it SPIELBERG'S film. 

(Genetive case does imply possession, and since spielberg bought it, he
certainly owns it, right??)

			"hi ho, hi ho"

				eric holtman
				harpo!whuxle!eric