Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxe.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!ihuxe!rainbow
From: rainbow@ihuxe.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: rebuttal to Greg Woods
Message-ID: <701@ihuxe.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 28-Jun-84 20:33:11 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihuxe.701
Posted: Thu Jun 28 20:33:11 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 30-Jun-84 04:21:27 EDT
Sender: rainbow@ihuxe.UUCP
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 26

I beg to differ with your comments. Trish Millines' article did not
exude hostility. It was a statement of fact which I totally agree with.
When will you and many others learn to face the facts and realize the truth.
I have known an awful lot of guys in my lifetime. I would feel sorry for
my sister if she'd marry any one of them. As a guy I see their true selves
and not the show/act they put on when in the company of women. To say her
article is a gross overgeneralization just proves you are trying to hide
your shame behind a bunch of meaningless words. Its pitiful that you
cannot even admit she is right, but to continue the charade is ridiculous.
You are looking awfully foolish. She could have used a lot more harsh terms
and still never reached the point of overgeneralization. To call her a
man-hater is absurd. I'm sure she has a good number of male friends.
Just like I do. But that does not stop one from forming opinions about
them. How can you call someone a bigot for expressing those opinions?
Your comments are totally unfounded and reveal a misguided view of
reality. And then you turn around and accuse her of the same thing.
Anyone with a little insight can see that you have just backed up her
words with your actions. I thank you for announcing them all over netland
to be used as exhibit A in Trish's defense. Counterproductive? Yeah, thats
what you just did with your article. Maladjusted? She sounds perfectly
adjusted to me. Unhappy? I see no trace of it. So where are you coming from?

Robert