Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxe.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!ihuxe!rainbow
From: rainbow@ihuxe.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: RE6:bigotry
Message-ID: <718@ihuxe.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 4-Jul-84 21:42:45 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihuxe.718
Posted: Wed Jul  4 21:42:45 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 5-Jul-84 00:43:45 EDT
Sender: rainbow@ihuxe.UUCP
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 23

<I have drawn this comment from an article by zehntel!zinfandel!steve>

> I am not saying your homosexuality<Trish> is a problem;
> it certainly shouldn't be considered so. It is your narrow-minded bigotry
> which is a problem.

These are the type of statements I have been getting irate with.
It is clear, concise, to the point, and leaves no doubt as to its intent.
Trish never posted an article with the title "most men are <etc>".
That line was just drawn out of an article with a totally different
purpose in mind. Hence we must ask for clarification so that we can 
understand the intent better. I don't think its right to resort to
immediate accusations. I don't think its right to show no concern
to uncover the truth. Is it so clear what Trish's feelings are?
Am I totally blind? Am I so naive as to think no one could actually
mean the literal interpretation of what she said? Am I way out of line
being upset over this matter? Please set me straight because I'm 
beginning to wonder with this opposition I'm getting.

Robert