Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxt.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!ihuxt!martillo
From: martillo@ihuxt.UUCP (Yehoyaqim Martillo)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.singles,net.motss
Subject: Re: Trish's ORIGINAL statement
Message-ID: <636@ihuxt.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 11-Jul-84 09:02:34 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihuxt.636
Posted: Wed Jul 11 09:02:34 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 12-Jul-84 04:01:44 EDT
References: <8299@watmath.UUCP> <2591@allegra.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 15

I have seen several claims in articles in newspapers and in journals over
the last couple months that men will make direct statements (like
"men are insensitive and callous") while women are much more indirect
(like "I think men are insensitive and callous" or "it seems to me that
men are insensitive and callous").  

Indirectness with potential for deniability is no excuse for bigoted
statements.

-- 

Who wouldn't break for whales?

Yehoyaqim Shemtob Martillo