Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1.chuqui 4/7/84; site nsc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!nsc!chuqui
From: chuqui@nsc.UUCP (Chuq Von Rospach)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Et tu, Chuq?
Message-ID: <1191@nsc.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 16-Jul-84 22:35:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: nsc.1191
Posted: Mon Jul 16 22:35:37 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 17-Jul-84 02:19:06 EDT
References: <2596@allegra.UUCP>, <1188@nsc.UUCP> <2606@allegra.UUCP>
Organization: The Warlocks Cave
Lines: 21

> 
> > My comments were because I felt that the attacks were aimed at Trish
> > personally, not on her comments and her ideas. If the flames had been
> > limited to what she had said I might have felt differently, but attacking
> > the person in an attempt to invalidate her comments bothered me.
> 
> Chuq, I think you side-stepped my question.  I didn't ask why you
> criticized me, I asked why you have been inconsistent in choosing
> who to criticise.

But I don't think I WAS inconsistent. You do, because I don't support your
position on this. My support positions are inherently consistent because I
only support one thing: things I believe in. You can read anything else
into it that you will, but I think that people started jumping on Trish
rather than jumping on her comments, and that is WRONG.

-- 
From the Kitchen of the Bistro:		Chuq Von Rospach
{amd,fortune,hplabs,ihnp4}!nsc!chuqui	(408) 733-2600 x242

Not the official Plaid Warlock of the 1984 olympics.