Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site randvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!randvax!edhall From: edhall@randvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: We aren't that simple. Message-ID: <1843@randvax.UUCP> Date: Mon, 16-Jul-84 20:26:27 EDT Article-I.D.: randvax.1843 Posted: Mon Jul 16 20:26:27 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 18-Jul-84 06:37:57 EDT References: <2408@decwrl.UUCP> Organization: Rand Corp., Santa Monica Lines: 30 >From Eirikur Hallgrimsson, on sex roles: > Like, maybe we could make them go away if > we yanked the trappings, and waited a couple of generations. I used to > believe this, and it *may* be true, but sex roles *evolved*, in the cultural > sense, and like most things that 'jest grew' they're horribly complicated, > and very well adapted. As to the argument that sex roles have such a long history and thus are next to impossible to change: they said the same things about slavery in the U.S. a bit over a hundred years ago. After all, slavery had existed for all recorded history, and is present in the Bible. Now, I'll be the first to admit that things are far from perfect regarding society's treatment of racial minorities, but this slowness to change is at least partly the result of a form of segregation that hardly affects the sexes. The ferment crucial to social change is quite possible, given people of courage and foresight; we don't put women and men in separate ghettos. ``Waiting'' has no part of this--it will be a struggle for us, and for our children. Howver, I believe that given patience, tolerance, and respect for other people, coupled with intolerance for injustice and inequality, in a ``couple of generations'' we can free ourselves from the roles which imprison us. Maybe I'm a hopeless optimist; then again, some of the people here seem well on their way to dying as cynics. (And, no, I'm hardly accusing Eirikur of being one, though there are others who qualify.) -Ed Hall decvax!randvax!edhall