Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mss.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!houxz!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!scgvaxd!mss!mahler From: mahler@mss.UUCP (mahler) Newsgroups: net.singles,net.politics Subject: Re: Homosexual teachers- a serious question Message-ID: <219@mss.UUCP> Date: Sat, 21-Jul-84 16:02:46 EDT Article-I.D.: mss.219 Posted: Sat Jul 21 16:02:46 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 24-Jul-84 03:44:36 EDT References: <2014@hplabsc.UUCP> <2612@allegra.UUCP>, <2023@hplabsc.UUCP> Organization: Mayfield Senior School, Pasadena, Ca Lines: 40 While I didn't see the article that started this discussion, the one quote that I saw from it, and the flavor of a couple of the responses has me concerned. I teach at a high school, and the idea that public pressure should be just cause for the removal of a teacher is questionalble at best (or at least I feel it is questionalble). For one thing, we need to recognize that the majority (of parents, of teachers, of the public, etc.) has a remarkable tendency to exhibit sheep herd qualities. This is to say that they can be easily whipped up into a frenzy without actually examining what they're get- ting worked up about. All of Germany got worked up during the 30's and 40's, but would you say that they were right to remove Jewish teachers from the schools? The public in Tennessee called for the removal of a teacher who taugh Darwin's theory of the origin of species. Were they right to do this? I'm not saying that either the state of Tennessee or the Germans didn't have the legal right to do what they wanted to with their teachers, but I do question whether they were RIGHT to exercise that right. Another point that I would raise, is the question of a parent's qualifications. I would not suggest that all teachers know what is best for their students, nor would I say that teachers necessarily know more about education than parents. I would, however, suggest that an experienced teacher might have a better idea of what he/she is up to in the classroom, than a parent who objects to the subject matter, or the methodology of a class. The reason I raise this point at all, is because I believe that opening a teachers lifestyle to public scrutiny and approval will lead to opening their opinions, beliefs, and methods of teaching to the same sort of scrutiny, and the same sort of threat of removal for holding to ways not approved of by the majority. Lastly (I realize I'm running on a bit here), I think that the question about the teacher's sexual preference is irrelevant. So long as a teacher does not flaunt, or try to coerce students into, his/her sexual orientation, that orientation is nobody's damned business. It is as wrong to glorify and flaunt hetrosexuality in the classroom as it is to do the same with homosexuality. Okay. I've said enough. Sorry if this was too long winded. Barry A. Long mss!mahler