Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site stat-l Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!CS-Mordred!Pucc-H:Pucc-I:Stat-L:acu From: acu@stat-l (Shoe) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: Redbook Survey Message-ID: <133@stat-l> Date: Wed, 25-Jul-84 17:27:43 EDT Article-I.D.: stat-l.133 Posted: Wed Jul 25 17:27:43 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 27-Jul-84 08:49:39 EDT References: <2012@hplabsc.UUCP> <161@uwmacc.UUCP> <866@pucc-h> <873@pucc-h> Organization: Purdue University Computing Center Lines: 33 I agree that ALL aspects of a healthy relationship (including sex) are enhanced by a deep commitment of the partners to one another. I do NOT agree that such a commitment must necessarily be founded in a religious (in the conventional meaning) environment. In fact, I imagine that those who are more committed to each other enjoy sex (and everything else they do together) more than those who put doctrine above people -eg- "We're not really in love any more, but divorce is sinful". It seems to me that the Redbook survey provides no hard evidence that women who hold tradition religious beliefs have more meaningful sex lives. First, the term "deeply religious" was never defined. I consider myself "deeply religious", but I don't subscribe to the major tenets of any Judaeo-Christian sect that I know of. Second, there is no proof that many of the respondents did not simply choose those answers that would put them in the most favorable light; being religious and enjoying sex are valued (by many people) in our society. (Perhaps Paul Dubois has more info on the controls used by Redbook). And lastly, the Redbook survey was (according to Paul's article) a "survey on sex lives of their readers"; further data needs to be provided before you can simply equate the general population of 1984 to the readers of Redbook in 1978. -- Mark Shoemaker /dev/shoe ...!pur-ee!pucc-k:acu mas@purdue Religion is the process of finding our inner strength. --Tolbert McCarroll