Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!houxz!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sri-unix!MG9G@CMCCTF
From: MG9G%CMCCTF@sri-unix.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.space
Subject: Sand/Pebbles/Geosynchronous orbit
Message-ID: <1706@sri-arpa.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 7-Jul-84 17:40:51 EDT
Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.1706
Posted: Sat Jul  7 17:40:51 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 11-Jul-84 02:36:05 EDT
Lines: 12


	How would sand or pebbles remain in geosynch. orbit?  It really
doesn't matter if the particles' orbits decay after 1 or 2 orbits-if there
are enough of them, which there would be, the job would be done by then...

	Why isn't this on net.arms?  We poor peons without access to CMU
Computer Science machines don't have access to ARPANET, and get the Space BB
only through the grace of the CMU Comp Center...

							Deej
							mg9g@cmu-cc-tf
   --------