Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxw.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!ihuxw!tommyo
From: tommyo@ihuxw.UUCP (Tom O`Connor)
Newsgroups: net.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: You Make The Call
Message-ID: <928@ihuxw.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 17-Jul-84 09:45:24 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihuxw.928
Posted: Tue Jul 17 09:45:24 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 18-Jul-84 02:45:27 EDT
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 10

I think the ump has some faulty ideas.   If indeed there were
runners at first and second, if he ruled the hit a single,
why did he allow ANY runs to score?  If both runners did
score before the appeal was made at second base, then both
runs should count.  Now if ther runner had missed FIRST base,
then the ruling that no runs should score would be correct.
I think you should have protested the game.

Tom O`Connor
ihuxw!tommyo