Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site watcgl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!watcgl!dmmartindale
From: dmmartindale@watcgl.UUCP (Dave Martindale)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Discrimination in insurance on the basis of sex
Message-ID: <2748@watcgl.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 27-Jun-84 01:09:34 EDT
Article-I.D.: watcgl.2748
Posted: Wed Jun 27 01:09:34 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 27-Jun-84 01:30:32 EDT
References: <-33300@hogpd.UUCP>, <3000001@hpdcdb.UUCP>
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 10

I said the same thing in a article about a month ago - that exactly
the same arguments apply to discriminating according to sex in auto
insurance and pension benefits, and that the two should be handled
consistently.

Two people replied (by mail) to my article.  Both agreed that the handling
should be consistent.  One thought that discrimination (this isn't necessarily
a negative word) was appropriate in both circumstances, the other thought
that there should be no sex-based discrimination.  Make of this what you
will.