Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site teldata.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!houxz!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!teltone!teldata!tac
From: tac@teldata.UUCP ()
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.women
Subject: Re: Female Veep
Message-ID: <421@teldata.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 9-Jul-84 12:11:08 EDT
Article-I.D.: teldata.421
Posted: Mon Jul  9 12:11:08 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 10-Jul-84 02:52:48 EDT
References: <2985@tektronix.UUCP>
Organization: Teltone Corp., Kirkland, WA
Lines: 20

, (sop to the blank line eaters--consider it a religious sacrifice)

  I heard a political columnist address the issue of a female on the
Mondale/Whoever ticket.  His comment was that it would be so obviously
a ploy for votes (he made references to the qualifications of the
women being considered) that it would loose more votes in the long
run than it gained.  I don't have the informational background to 
support or refute that statement, but it seems to make sense to me.

  As to Reagan's re-election insuring a conservative Supreme Court,
that seems awfully like what I heard about his election four years
ago.

From the Soapbox of
Tom Condon     {...!uw-beaver!teltone!teldata!tac}

DISCLAIMER:  The opinions expressed herein are those of everyone who
  matters, but not necessarily anyone you know, and most certainly not
  my employers!