Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pucc-k Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!CS-Mordred!Pucc-H:Pucc-I:Pucc-K:afo From: afo@pucc-k (sefton) Newsgroups: net.comics Subject: Reply on Dr. Who Comic Message-ID: <248@pucc-k> Date: Sat, 28-Jul-84 16:20:18 EDT Article-I.D.: pucc-k.248 Posted: Sat Jul 28 16:20:18 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 29-Jul-84 23:58:52 EDT Organization: Purdue University Computing Center Lines: 29 And now for something completely different: 1. Yes, I know that Marvel is repeating the Dr. Who comics from their weekly (now monthly) in the U.K. 2. I am quite aware that the Tom Baker persona of the Doctor is probably the favourite of North Amerian fandom. <> <> However; If I am going to pay $1.50 for this mag, I want to see something for it!! I think it was the combination of the lateness of the magazine, the re-hash from the old Premiere, and the #$%&'%()0("# Dalek story in the back. If they had to wait 6 months after they announce the appearance of this magazine, I want to see some new material! I feel as if Marvel is going for some really hard-core fan abusing in this. They can print 6 year old strips, and make a large amount of money on it. I realise that they aren't in the business out of the goodness of their hearts, but they seem to be inreasingly crossing over the line of sheer abuse. <> Laurie pucc-k:afo