Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-ngp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kjm
From: kjm@ut-ngp.UUCP (Ken Montgomery)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: final argument against
Message-ID: <898@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 31-Aug-84 21:06:53 EDT
Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.898
Posted: Fri Aug 31 21:06:53 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 3-Sep-84 11:13:14 EDT
References: <3477@decwrl.UUCP>
Organization: Comp. Center, Univ. of Texas at Austin
Lines: 22


  > From: merrill@gigi.DEC (Rick GIGI::Merrill  DECRITE)
  >
  > If you already OPPOSE ABORTION you may want to STOP reading.
  > If you are so-called "pro-choice" and claim you or others have a
  > "choice" to kill the unborn, what is it inside you that still prevents
  > you from choosing to consume what you kill?  Most hunters at least do that.

Do you eat every bug you kill?  (Cockroaches! Yum! :-))  What is so
special about the unborn?  Should we make them a delicacy, perhaps? :-) :-)

[BTW, notice that the author of the quoted article appears to be a man,
judging by the first name given.  Why do men oppose a solution for a
problem that can't happen to them, when this solution can't hurt them?]
--
Continuing to take anti-choice arguments with a large grain of ":-)",
I remain the

"Shredder-of-hapless-smurfs"  [the CARTOON smurfs, Mr. Arndt!]
(Ken Montgomery)
...!{ihnp4,seismo,ctvax}!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kjm  [Usenet, when working]
kjm@ut-ngp.ARPA  [for Arpanauts only]