Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site trsvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!trsvax!mikey
From: mikey@trsvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: followup on pre-echo - (nf)
Message-ID: <55100054@trsvax.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 7-Sep-84 10:43:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: trsvax.55100054
Posted: Fri Sep  7 10:43:00 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 13-Sep-84 08:06:13 EDT
References: <2228@sdccsu3.UUCP>
Lines: 18
Nf-ID: #R:sdccsu3:-222800:trsvax:55100054:000:621
Nf-From: trsvax!mikey    Sep  7 09:43:00 1984

#R:sdccsu3:-222800:trsvax:55100054:000:621
trsvax!mikey    Sep  7 09:43:00 1984



Time the echo.  If it is exactly one revolution of the record, it is groove
distortion.  If it is not exactly one revolution of the record, it had
to come from somewhere else, presumably tape print thru.

mikey at trsvax


I heard some time ago of a record processor that when cutting a master disk,
would play it twice.  Once to find out where the loud passsages were that
were preceded by quite passages.  This system would then give a slightly
larger gap to the groves at the second tape playing and cutting process
to limit the echo.  I don't know if anyone is using this machine, but it
sounded like a good idea.