Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.14 $; site uiucdcs.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!kaufman From: kaufman@uiucdcs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: VP Vice: VP <> Prez - (nf) Message-ID: <36200146@uiucdcs.UUCP> Date: Fri, 24-Aug-84 15:14:00 EDT Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.36200146 Posted: Fri Aug 24 15:14:00 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 29-Aug-84 05:21:25 EDT Lines: 37 Nf-ID: #N:uiucdcs:36200146:000:2284 Nf-From: uiucdcs!kaufman Aug 24 14:14:00 1984 #N:uiucdcs:36200146:000:2284 uiucdcs!kaufman Aug 24 14:14:00 1984 [This line will self-destruct in 5 seconds ... Good luck, Jim!] As far as I can tell from what I've seen of the Republican Convention, the most popular GOP attack on Mondale stems from the fact that he was Jimmy Carter's Vice President. The implication is that a vote for Mondale is a vote for Carter. Little do these Republicans remember their own recent history. You see, a long time ago in a Galaxy far away, a man named Reagan outprimaried such opponents as Howard Baker, John Anderson, and one George Bush. Bush was the runner up in the delegate sweepstakes, and until he pulled out sometime in late spring, he ran quite a heated campaign against the eventual President, differing on almost every issue. Bush took more the standard conservative path, while many of Reagan's proposals were radical enough to woo the right wing of the Party. Then the bombshell at the convention when Reagan finally announced Bush would be his running mate, and suddenly, there the two of them were on the platform. Just as suddenly, there had never been any differences between the two. Bush agreed with Reagan all the way. My reaction then was: Bullshit. My reaction now is: Politics. (You see, my opinions haven't changed at all in four years :-) It is a sad but true fact that Vice Presidents (and candidates for that post) have to follow the lead of their running mates in order not to rock the boat. Despite his spoken support, I seriously doubt Bush would continue a lot of Reagan programs should he become President in 1988. The same holds true for the Democrats. I am sure that Mondale would eliminate quite a bit of the policy from the Carter administration. Millions and millions of Americans could probably handle the economy better than J.C. did. I tend to believe that Mondale is one of them (as Reagan probably is too). But it is NOT a one issue campaign. And if the worst thing the Republicans can say about Mondale is that he VPed for Carter, I may have to vote for him. Hopefully, GOP leaders will quit this smear campaign, address the issues, and let the people decide, rather than taking the easy way out and trying to delude them. Maybe I'll just vote for Bill the Cat; Opus hasn't had to compromise himself. Ken Kaufman (uiucdcs!kaufman)