Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site sdccsu3.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!sdcrdcf!sdcsvax!sdccsu3!taylor
From: taylor@sdccsu3.UUCP (Dave Taylor)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: The Kiss of Death
Message-ID: <2217@sdccsu3.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 1-Sep-84 01:05:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: sdccsu3.2217
Posted: Sat Sep  1 01:05:15 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 30-Aug-84 06:31:31 EDT
Organization: The La Jolla Institute of Computer Science
Lines: 46

Reference: net.flame, article 5267

Gee, I hate to be silly and inane or anything, but why the f*** should
we be discussing MORALS?  I suspect that the average person subscribing
to this network does NOT want to read flaming-hot articles that will
burn out the phosphor on their screen from virtrolic hate (good phrase
eh?) (pardon the crass generalization!) on the morality of homosexuality.

	If this discussion did take off, all that would occur is that
there would be narrow minded pinheaded twits like, well, umm, gee, yourself,
who would stand on their stack of bibles and biased books etc and spout
about the inherent evil of it, and phrases like 'if God meant man to be
homosexual, he would have allowed two adults of the same sex to procreate'
or perhaps more likely 'Gee, look at all the horrid illnesses that gay
people get...it must surely mean that homosexual people are damned!'

	That, my friend (?) is BULLSHIT!

	Morality-wise, I couldn't give a f*** about how someone else lives
their life.  If they contract some wild disease, I will NOT accuse them of
ruining the capitalistic way of life that we lead, or proving to be another
of them 'commie plots' or whatever you get so gung ho about.

	(Gee...I am getting more hostile as I go..soon I might be coughing
	 and wheezing from the inevitable asbestos that I will be forced to
	 don)

	Sigh.  I have this strange feeling that there are some people who
really DO argue for the sake of arguing.  Not only that, but you are one
of them.  

	The worst part is you claim to back your comments up with research.
I know that the 'printed' word is a double-edged sword, but you wield it
with the cunning of a viper.  This is NOT complimentary.

	I am reminded of the quote "Ahh Religion.  What evils have been 
done in your name!" (or some permutation of that!).  I think we can, in
closing, safely adapt the quote for this situation;

	Ahh Research!  What evils have been done citing you!

					Firmly ensconsed,

						Dave Taylor