Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pucc-k Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!CS-Mordred!Pucc-H:Pucc-I:Pucc-K:agz From: agz@pucc-k (banta) Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: Ronald Reagan/Bombing USSR - (nf) Message-ID: <293@pucc-k> Date: Fri, 31-Aug-84 22:45:42 EDT Article-I.D.: pucc-k.293 Posted: Fri Aug 31 22:45:42 1984 Date-Received: Mon, 3-Sep-84 08:35:45 EDT References: <1575@zehntel.UUCP> Organization: Purdue University Computing Center Lines: 29 ************* Yet millions of glassy-eyed zombots will vote for Reagan again! Why Ronald Reagan? Why not Arthur Godfrey or George Fenneman or Harry Von Zell? If you want some old fogey, dead or alive, who can sit at the head of a conservative administration, why not any of those equally qualified gentlemen? If it is conservative policies you want, why not elect a statesman rather than an actor, a humanitarian rather than a puppet? Or would they really be electable on the strength of their policies alone... perhaps those policies which do not benefit the voting masses can only be elected by having them sold to the masses by such a slick salesman as Reagan? ************* Why is it that people stoop to techniques such as question the intelligence of people because of their ideals. It really makes me sick to see some- body try to make their point not by attacking the policies, not by attacking the man, but attacking those who support him, by calling them insipid and uninformed. Maybe they feel oh so much better than the rest of the world for pointing out everybody else's mistakes, but as far as I'm concerned, it's fairly stupid to insult another person's intelligence merely on which candidate he prefers. Go ahead and use this technique, I guess. Actually, I don't think I have any way of stopping you. I just hope that there are are enough people out there who can rely on themselves rather than somebody else to decide if they are making a wise choice. pucc-k!agz (banta) "Stay tuned for more fanatics after this message..."