Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!houxm!mhuxl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!decwrl!amd!fortune!wdl1!jbn From: jbn@wdl1.UUCP (jbn ) Newsgroups: net.followup Subject: Re: Re: more on alternate energy sources Message-ID: <402@wdl1.UUCP> Date: Fri, 7-Sep-84 21:22:08 EDT Article-I.D.: wdl1.402 Posted: Fri Sep 7 21:22:08 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 13-Sep-84 19:08:17 EDT Lines: 86 Nf-ID: #R:sun:-164000:wdl1:5800001:000:3586 Nf-From: wdl1!jbn Sep 7 15:14:00 1984 A brief summary of the problems with alternative energy sources: SOLAR POWER PASSIVE HOUSE HEATING Very feasible, if the house is designed with it in mind. You still need a backup heating system, but it doesn't get used often. SWIMMNG POOL HEATING Best known application. That big pool of water is just what you want for heat storage. Less popular since CA turned off the tax incentive. ACTIVE HOUSE HEATING / HOT WATER HEATING Often useful. System must be engineered properly; there have been bad designs that used more power to drive the pumps than the system delivered as output. The heat storage problem is moderatly tough; somewhere there needs to be a big tank of water, or rocks, or something. ACTIVE AIR CONDITIONING It can be done, but usually isn't worth the trouble. One installation that works is in the Santa Clara, CA, recreation center, a nice place to visit during hot weather energy crunches. But there is a LOT of machinery making it work. PHOTOVOLTAICS Coming along; up to 7-9% efficiency now. Still expensive, but may get better. Useful for power in remote areas; my favorite is the solar-powered fence charger for electric fences (see Sears Farm and Ranch Catalog). The big problem remains batteries. Kirby's photovoltaic system (Kirby is the inventor of the IC, and works for (and owns a big piece of) Texas Instruments), seems promising, but pumping hot hydrobromic acid around is not my idea of appropriate technology for the home. (Sure you can make it work with stainless steel pipe and 100% X-ray inspected welds, just like the nuclear plants, but it costs). But maybe they will develop a better chemistry. WIND POWER It now appears that medium-sized windmills (about 50' blade diameter) are the best size; the giant units are down too much and the small ones aren't worth the trouble. There are some really great tax incentives to own a share of a wind farm in CA; see your broker (Merril Lynch has a scheme) for details. But it isn't economic compared to even oil power, and it only works when you have other sources to take up the slack during low-wind periods. Again, the storage problem. SMALL HYDRO Efficient when producing, the problem is finding good sites. Plants that produce juice only during spring runoff aren't enormously useful. But if you can tap into a non-seasonal watercourse, you can have a nice little power source, plus some extra income during peak periods. WAVE POWER This has been tried on and off for centuries; the elaborate mechanisms with lots of floats and machinery keep breaking in storms and need lots of maintenance. And again, sometimes there are no waves. ---------------- The basic problem with all these technologies is that none of them are good base load power sources that you can rely on; all must be backed up by some other technology. Even multiple units of the same technology don't help; all the windmills stop in a calm. None of these technologies can power an energy-intensive industry like, say, aluminum refining, or even a large city. And when you add in the cost of the energy storage facilities, these technologies look a lot worse. Personally, I like deep natural gas as an energy solution, followed by fusion if we can ever make it work. Knowing that the SPS is possible is nice in case we can't, but it seems like a lot of work just to get an energy source. Fission power is too messy, and I don't really approve of any reactor you can't just scram and walk away from.