Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.14 $; site uiucdcs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!bryan
From: bryan@uiucdcs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.games.frp
Subject: Re: Rule Interpretation - (nf)
Message-ID: <9300035@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 8-Sep-84 02:02:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.9300035
Posted: Sat Sep  8 02:02:00 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 13-Sep-84 07:36:45 EDT
References: <1039@ucla-cs.UUCP>
Lines: 15
Nf-ID: #R:ucla-cs:-103900:uiucdcs:9300035:000:595
Nf-From: uiucdcs!bryan    Sep  8 01:02:00 1984

#R:ucla-cs:-103900:uiucdcs:9300035:000:595
uiucdcs!bryan    Sep  8 01:02:00 1984

I disagree slightly to the base note.  I believe that the questioners are
more probably trying to get the opinion of the neters on the way that others
see a certain rule and to find out what is the most widely used interpretation
so as to bring the game more toward a set of rules which one can depend on
being similar as one moves from one campaign to another. The rules are there
as a guideline but also as a limiting framework in which the players know
what to expect if they do this or that instead of having a surprise every
round.

comments and other opinions eagerly welcomed,

rob bryan