Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site CS-Arthur Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!CS-Mordred!CS-Arthur!cak From: cak@CS-Arthur (Christopher A Kent) Newsgroups: net.lan Subject: Re: HP's TCP/IP implementation Message-ID: <725@CS-Arthur> Date: Fri, 31-Aug-84 10:28:01 EDT Article-I.D.: CS-Arthu.725 Posted: Fri Aug 31 10:28:01 1984 Date-Received: Mon, 3-Sep-84 08:27:36 EDT References: <260@cbosgd.UUCP> Organization: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University Lines: 43 In my opinion, there are only two words to describe what HP has done with their "TCP" ... !! BBBBBBB !! BB BB !! BB BB !! BB BB !! BBBBBBB ooooo gggggg uu uu ssssss !! BB BB oo oo gg gg uu uu ss !! BB BB oo oo gg gg uu uu sssss !! BB BB oo oo gg gg uu uu ss BB BB oo oo gg gg uu uu ss ss BBBBBBB ooooo gggggg uuuuuuu sssss !! gg gg gg gg gggggg and !! LL !! LL !! LL ii !! LL nn !! LL ooooo ssssss iii nnnnnn gggggg !! LL oo oo ss ii nn nn gg gg !! LL oo oo sssss ii nn nn gg gg !! LL oo oo ss ii nn nn gg gg LL oo oo ss ss ii nn nn gg gg LLLLLLLL ooooo sssss iiii nn nn gggggg !! gg gg gg gg gggggg I can only hope that someone from HP is reading this. Their decision in this regard is just plain wrong. chris